When social media users think of “real-time” engagement,
they automatically think of Twitter. In recent years, Twitter has dominated the
market of real-time advertising. A major partner of Twitter is the National
Football League, which allows Twitter to sell video ads against highlights from
games that are posted on the site. With all the success Twitter has had, other
social media companies want a piece of the profits and have begun to implement
their own user live engagement solutions.
Google announced last week that it is launching “real-time
ads.” This would allow advertisers to serve video advertisements across YouTube,
thousands of apps, and millions of partner websites during special events. Google
plans to create ways to “time” mobile, video and display ads in conjunction
with live events such as sports, political rallies, and award shows. Beta
testing of this new platform has been conducted with companies such as EA Games
and American Express, showing positive results. In addition, YouTube AdBlitz
will once again combine all Super Bowl ads into a central location to allow
consumers to watch and vote on. Google’s more aggressive actions for ad dollars
during major events have stepped up the competition with Twitter, leaving
advertisers with a more difficult choice when it comes to choosing a media
outlet.
Does Twitter still have the advantage? With an already
established user-base attracted to its real-time ads and major partnerships
with companies, Twitter has a leg up on the competition. In addition, Twitter
recently bought Periscope in order to increase its real-time service with live
streaming videos added to the Twitter stream. The details and technicality of
Google’s new live engagement still remain slightly unknown and confusing.
Twitter on the other hand allows companies to specifically target users
specifically interested in an event such as the Super Bowl. The use of hashtags
identifies these individuals more precisely, adding to the effectiveness of
real-time ads. Research has shown that
users click on Twitter ads 20% of the time during special events, in contrast
to 3% on regular days (Sloane).
These numbers prove that live events are when Twitter advertisers best perform
on the social media platform. Although Twitter has made efforts to expand its
reach to consumers, Google has a massive footprint when it comes to Internet
advertising. Google is an extremely powerful company, with a large reach and
scale, especially with ad platforms. In saying this, could Google’s “real-time
ads” stand a chance in the live engagement market?
I think this article will fully complement you article. PLease continue publishing helpful topics like this. Regards, from Always Open Commerce
ReplyDelete